South Africa’s biggest labour union and three opposition parties sued the nation’s president, the energy and public enterprises ministries and Eskom over their approach to ending a 15-year energy crisis.
The lawsuit, filed in the High Court in the capital, Pretoria, seeks a wide range of remedies, including the exemption of all hospitals and agriculture from electricity outages to the release of documents regarding the non-performance of two coal-fired plants that ran billions of dollars over budget.
The legal action also seeks to have the planned shutdown of coal-fired facilities reconsidered.
The case, one of at least four filed against the government or its institutions over power cuts and electricity-tariff increases, adds to pressure on President Cyril Ramaphosa to ease the country’s worst-ever blackouts with outages imposed every day this month and on 205 days last year.
While it’s uncertain what the prospects of success are for the cases, they heighten the focus on the governing African National Congress’s failure to provide basic services just over a year before the country holds elections.
“The public is kept in the dark as to how the management of the grid has reached a near state of collapse without consequence or accountability,” Bantu Holomisa, the president of the United Democratic Movement political party, said in his court affidavit.
“Eskom, as a state entity, has been grossly mismanaged to the extent where it’s now unable to perform its primary task of providing electricity.”
The case was filed by 19 applicants, including opposition parties the UDM, the Inkatha Freedom Party, and ActionSA, as well as the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa.
It lists eight respondents, including Eskom, Ramaphosa, the government departments, and the National Energy Regulator of South Africa.
Ramaphosa’s office declined to comment, as did the Department of Public Enterprises.
The energy department and Eskom didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, while the regulator said it would comment later.
If the applicants succeed in having the power cuts interdicted, Eskom would need to halt essential maintenance that would lead to worse blackouts, Andre de Ruyter, the utility’s chief executive officer, said earlier this month after the initial threat of legal action was made.
South Africa’s biggest opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, has filed a case demanding that an 18.7% power tariff increase granted to Eskom by Nersa be scrapped and plans a march to the ANC’s headquarters in Johannesburg on Wednesday to protest the crisis.
A plan to transition the country away from coal-fired power plants, which currently account for more than 80% of supply, to more reliance on renewable power, which has been backed by the president, was attacked in the court case filed by the three opposition parties.
“One must then pose the rational question why the state believes it proper to obliterate the nation’s existing power supply,” Holomisa said.
Renewable energy plants “cannot sustain or support the nation’s power consumption needs in the immediate future,” he added.
Numsa is the second-biggest union at Eskom, with many of its members working at coal-fired plants.
Other demands made by the applicants in the case include:
- The tariff increase granted to Eskom be suspended.
- Eskom provide notice of its power-cut plans and allow for electricity users to make representations about those plans.
- The Minister of Public Enterprises and Eskom file a plan with the court explaining how they will end the outages.
- Ramaphosa should produce a plan to ease the impact of the power cuts on the economy and society and release the details of any agreement with foreign governments to secure funding for the reduction of the country’s reliance on coal for electricity.
- Ramaphosa and the minister named be found to have breached the constitution, which includes the right to health and education.